WC3 Tracker›Maps›Blood Tournament Ultra V 9(Final) vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Blood Tournament Ultra V 9(Final) vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 5. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Blood Tournament Ultra V 9(Final) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Blood Tournament Ultra V 9(Final) Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricBlood Tournament Ultra V 9(Final)Warofraces
Total sessions57,636 ▲
Unique hosts1258 ▲
Avg players/lobby14.6 ▲
Avg lobby open time1 min ▲4 min
Sessions (30d)01,564 ▲
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJun 20, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
1
1,531
Jun 26
1
4,233
Jul 26
0
2,312
Explore Each Map
Blood Tournament Ultra V 9(Final) full stats → Warofraces full stats → Watch live Blood Tournament Ultra V 9(Final) lobbies Watch live Warofraces lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Blood Tournament Ultra V 9(Final) and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Blood Tournament Ultra V 9(Final) (1).
Blood Tournament Ultra V 9(Final) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,564 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Blood Tournament Ultra V 9(Final) has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.