WC3 TrackerMapsBloodfangarena vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Bloodfangarena vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,503 recorded sessions versus 2. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Bloodfangarena lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Bloodfangarena Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricBloodfangarenaWarofraces
Total sessions27,503
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby24.6
Avg lobby open time1 min 3.9 min
Sessions (30d)21,717
Tracked versions136
Last hostedJul 1, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
2
1,364

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Bloodfangarena and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,503 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Bloodfangarena (2).
Bloodfangarena lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,717 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Bloodfangarena has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.