WC3 TrackerMapsBlood.Tournament.Reloaded.V vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Blood.Tournament.Reloaded.V vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 27. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2.5), suggesting larger games. Blood.Tournament.Reloaded.V lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.2 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Blood.Tournament.Reloaded.V Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricBlood.Tournament.Reloaded.VWarofraces
Total sessions277,636
Unique hosts7258
Avg players/lobby2.54.6
Avg lobby open time3.2 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)21,575
Tracked versions437
Last hostedJul 9, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
5
1,531
Jun 26
27
4,233
Jul 26
3
2,342

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Blood.Tournament.Reloaded.V and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 27 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Blood.Tournament.Reloaded.V (2.5).
Blood.Tournament.Reloaded.V lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.2 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,575 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Blood.Tournament.Reloaded.V has been hosted by 7 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.