WC3 TrackerMapsBloodvenomfalls vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Bloodvenomfalls vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,480 recorded sessions versus 64. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.5), suggesting larger games. Bloodvenomfalls lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.9 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Bloodvenomfalls Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricBloodvenomfallsWarofraces
Total sessions647,480
Unique hosts33258
Avg players/lobby1.54.6
Avg lobby open time1.9 min 3.9 min
Sessions (30d)121,662
Tracked versions235
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
24
1,531
Jun 26
78
4,233
Jul 26
7
1,158

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Bloodvenomfalls and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,480 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 64 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Bloodvenomfalls (1.5).
Bloodvenomfalls lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.9 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,662 vs 12). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Bloodvenomfalls has been hosted by 33 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.