WC3 TrackerMapsBlue Td vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Blue Td vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 41,634 recorded sessions versus 66. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 3.3), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.4 min for Blue Td. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Blue Td Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBlue TdDirect Strike
Total sessions6641,634
Unique hosts111,615
Avg players/lobby3.35.2
Avg lobby open time2.4 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)1910,789
Tracked versions8102
Last hostedJul 4, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
12
8,392
Jun 26
75
30,642
Jul 26
9
7,181

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Blue Td and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 41,634 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 66 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Blue Td (3.3).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.4 min for Blue Td. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,789 vs 19). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Blue Td has been hosted by 11 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.