WC3 TrackerMapsBrutalwinter vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Brutalwinter vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 43,167 recorded sessions versus 16. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.8), suggesting larger games. Brutalwinter lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Brutalwinter Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBrutalwinterDirect Strike
Total sessions1643,167
Unique hosts121,615
Avg players/lobby1.85.2
Avg lobby open time1 min 1.7 min
Sessions (30d)710,399
Tracked versions1102
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 7, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
5
8,392
Jun 26
25
30,642
Jul 26
7
8,913

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Brutalwinter and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 43,167 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 16 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Brutalwinter (1.8).
Brutalwinter lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,399 vs 7). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Brutalwinter has been hosted by 12 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.