WC3 TrackerMapsBrutalwinter vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Brutalwinter vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,557 recorded sessions versus 16. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.8), suggesting larger games. Brutalwinter lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Brutalwinter Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricBrutalwinterWarofraces
Total sessions167,557
Unique hosts12258
Avg players/lobby1.84.6
Avg lobby open time1 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)71,662
Tracked versions136
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 7, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
5
1,531
Jun 26
25
4,233
Jul 26
7
1,465

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Brutalwinter and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,557 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 16 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Brutalwinter (1.8).
Brutalwinter lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,662 vs 7). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Brutalwinter has been hosted by 12 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.