WC3 TrackerMapsBtt Survival vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Btt Survival vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 41,856 recorded sessions versus 10. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.8), suggesting larger games. Btt Survival lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.6 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Btt Survival Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBtt SurvivalDirect Strike
Total sessions1041,856
Unique hosts71,615
Avg players/lobby1.85.2
Avg lobby open time0.6 min 1.7 min
Sessions (30d)110,426
Tracked versions1102
Last hostedJul 4, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
4
8,392
Jun 26
11
30,642
Jul 26
1
7,424

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Btt Survival and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 41,856 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 10 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Btt Survival (1.8).
Btt Survival lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.6 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,426 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Btt Survival has been hosted by 7 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.