WC3 TrackerMapsBuild To Fight vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Build To Fight vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 16. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 4.1), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 17.9 min for Build To Fight. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Build To Fight Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricBuild To FightWarofraces
Total sessions167,636
Unique hosts2258
Avg players/lobby4.14.6
Avg lobby open time17.9 min4 min
Sessions (30d)01,557
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 1, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
3
1,531
Jun 26
25
4,233
Jul 26
1
2,280

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Build To Fight and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 16 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Build To Fight (4.1).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 4 min on average versus 17.9 min for Build To Fight. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,557 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Build To Fight has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.