WC3 TrackerMapsBurbenogtdriseofthefallen vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Burbenogtdriseofthefallen vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 41,929 recorded sessions versus 20. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 2.9), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.1 min for Burbenogtdriseofthefallen. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Burbenogtdriseofthefallen Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBurbenogtdriseofthefallenDirect Strike
Total sessions2041,929
Unique hosts71,615
Avg players/lobby2.95.2
Avg lobby open time3.1 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)410,516
Tracked versions1102
Last hostedJul 3, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
3
8,392
Jun 26
30
30,642
Jul 26
2
7,517

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Burbenogtdriseofthefallen and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 41,929 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 20 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Burbenogtdriseofthefallen (2.9).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.1 min for Burbenogtdriseofthefallen. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,516 vs 4). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Burbenogtdriseofthefallen has been hosted by 7 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.