WC3 TrackerMapsCardtd2.2a vs Zombie Defense
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Cardtd2.2a vs Zombie Defense

Zombie Defense is the more popular of the two, with 4,885 recorded sessions versus 7. Zombie Defense averages more players per lobby (2.7 vs 1.1), suggesting larger games. Zombie Defense lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.4 min on average versus 3.2 min for Cardtd2.2a. Over the past 30 days, Zombie Defense has seen more activity.

Cardtd2.2a Zombie Defense
Head to Head
MetricCardtd2.2aZombie Defense
Total sessions74,885
Unique hosts2281
Avg players/lobby1.12.7
Avg lobby open time3.2 min2.4 min
Sessions (30d)72,261
Tracked versions128
Last hostedJun 12, 2026Jun 13, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
2,307
Jun 26
7
2,416

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Cardtd2.2a and Zombie Defense on Warcraft 3

Zombie Defense is more popular, with 4,885 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 7 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Zombie Defense has more players per lobby on average (2.7) than Cardtd2.2a (1.1).
Zombie Defense lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.4 min on average versus 3.2 min for Cardtd2.2a. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Zombie Defense has had more sessions in the last 30 days (2,261 vs 7). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Cardtd2.2a has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Zombie Defense by 281. Zombie Defense has the wider host base.