WC3 TrackerMapsCastle Defence vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Castle Defence vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 52,277 recorded sessions versus 1. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Castle Defence lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Castle Defence Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricCastle DefenceDirect Strike
Total sessions152,277
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby15.3
Avg lobby open time0.2 min 1.7 min
Sessions (30d)110,328
Tracked versions1110
Last hostedJul 15, 2026Jul 17, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
0
30,642
Jul 26
1
22,889

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Castle Defence and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 52,277 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 1 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Castle Defence (1).
Castle Defence lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,328 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Castle Defence has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.