WC3 Tracker›Maps›Castle Fight Perks Edition vs Daemonic Sword Orpg R4
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Castle Fight Perks Edition vs Daemonic Sword Orpg R4

Castle Fight Perks Edition is the more popular of the two, with 7,869 recorded sessions versus 13. Castle Fight Perks Edition averages more players per lobby (5 vs 1.7), suggesting larger games. Daemonic Sword Orpg R4 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 2.1 min for Castle Fight Perks Edition. Over the past 30 days, Castle Fight Perks Edition has seen more activity.

Castle Fight Perks Edition Daemonic Sword Orpg R4
Head to Head
MetricCastle Fight Perks EditionDaemonic Sword Orpg R4
Total sessions7,869 ▲13
Unique hosts378 ▲1
Avg players/lobby5 ▲1.7
Avg lobby open time2.1 min1.4 min ▲
Sessions (30d)2,481 ▲13
Tracked versions191
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
Jun 26
6,642
0
Jul 26
1,793
13
Explore Each Map
Castle Fight Perks Edition full stats → Daemonic Sword Orpg R4 full stats → Watch live Castle Fight Perks Edition lobbies Watch live Daemonic Sword Orpg R4 lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Castle Fight Perks Edition and Daemonic Sword Orpg R4 on Warcraft 3

Castle Fight Perks Edition is more popular, with 7,869 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 13 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Castle Fight Perks Edition has more players per lobby on average (5) than Daemonic Sword Orpg R4 (1.7).
Daemonic Sword Orpg R4 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 2.1 min for Castle Fight Perks Edition. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Castle Fight Perks Edition has had more sessions in the last 30 days (2,481 vs 13). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Castle Fight Perks Edition has been hosted by 378 unique BattleTags and Daemonic Sword Orpg R4 by 1. Castle Fight Perks Edition has the wider host base.