WC3 TrackerMapsCastle Fight Perks Edition vs Zoodefencerb
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Castle Fight Perks Edition vs Zoodefencerb

Castle Fight Perks Edition is the more popular of the two, with 7,881 recorded sessions versus 66. Castle Fight Perks Edition averages more players per lobby (5 vs 2.9), suggesting larger games. Zoodefencerb lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 2.1 min for Castle Fight Perks Edition. Over the past 30 days, Castle Fight Perks Edition has seen more activity.

Castle Fight Perks Edition Zoodefencerb
Head to Head
MetricCastle Fight Perks EditionZoodefencerb
Total sessions7,881 66
Unique hosts378 9
Avg players/lobby5 2.9
Avg lobby open time2.1 min1.4 min
Sessions (30d)2,495 13
Tracked versions192
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
2
Jun 26
6,642
75
Jul 26
1,806
12

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Castle Fight Perks Edition and Zoodefencerb on Warcraft 3

Castle Fight Perks Edition is more popular, with 7,881 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 66 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Castle Fight Perks Edition has more players per lobby on average (5) than Zoodefencerb (2.9).
Zoodefencerb lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 2.1 min for Castle Fight Perks Edition. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Castle Fight Perks Edition has had more sessions in the last 30 days (2,495 vs 13). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Castle Fight Perks Edition has been hosted by 378 unique BattleTags and Zoodefencerb by 9. Castle Fight Perks Edition has the wider host base.