WC3 TrackerMapsCcd vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Ccd vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 43,200 recorded sessions versus 13. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 0.8), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 4.2 min for Ccd. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Ccd Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricCcdDirect Strike
Total sessions1343,200
Unique hosts51,615
Avg players/lobby0.85.2
Avg lobby open time4.2 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)810,437
Tracked versions4102
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 7, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
14
30,642
Jul 26
2
8,949

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Ccd and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 43,200 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 13 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Ccd (0.8).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 4.2 min for Ccd. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,437 vs 8). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Ccd has been hosted by 5 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.