WC3 TrackerMapsCentaurgrove vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Centaurgrove vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 41,808 recorded sessions versus 50. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.4), suggesting larger games. Centaurgrove lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.3 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Centaurgrove Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricCentaurgroveDirect Strike
Total sessions5041,808
Unique hosts251,615
Avg players/lobby1.45.2
Avg lobby open time1.3 min 1.7 min
Sessions (30d)1310,365
Tracked versions3102
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
13
8,392
Jun 26
55
30,642
Jul 26
13
7,374

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Centaurgrove and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 41,808 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 50 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Centaurgrove (1.4).
Centaurgrove lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.3 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,365 vs 13). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Centaurgrove has been hosted by 25 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.