WC3 TrackerMapsCh Revival 0.3a(Hotfix 1) vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Ch Revival 0.3a(Hotfix 1) vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 48,452 recorded sessions versus 2. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 4), suggesting larger games. Ch Revival 0.3a(Hotfix 1) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.2 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Ch Revival 0.3a(Hotfix 1) Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricCh Revival 0.3a(Hotfix 1)Direct Strike
Total sessions248,452
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby45.3
Avg lobby open time1.2 min 1.7 min
Sessions (30d)210,040
Tracked versions1105
Last hostedJul 12, 2026Jul 12, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
0
30,642
Jul 26
2
16,654

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Ch Revival 0.3a(Hotfix 1) and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 48,452 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Ch Revival 0.3a(Hotfix 1) (4).
Ch Revival 0.3a(Hotfix 1) lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.2 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,040 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Ch Revival 0.3a(Hotfix 1) has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.