WC3 TrackerMapsCircle Td Eternal 1.1b.F vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Circle Td Eternal 1.1b.F vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,587 recorded sessions versus 2. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 4), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.5 min for Circle Td Eternal 1.1b.F. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Circle Td Eternal 1.1b.F Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricCircle Td Eternal 1.1b.FDirect Strike
Total sessions247,587
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby45.3
Avg lobby open time3.5 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)29,874
Tracked versions1104
Last hostedJul 8, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
0
30,642
Jul 26
2
14,529

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Circle Td Eternal 1.1b.F and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,587 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Circle Td Eternal 1.1b.F (4).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.5 min for Circle Td Eternal 1.1b.F. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,874 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Circle Td Eternal 1.1b.F has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.