WC3 TrackerMapsCorona vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Corona vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,450 recorded sessions versus 5. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 4.9 min for Corona. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Corona Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricCoronaDirect Strike
Total sessions547,450
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby25.3
Avg lobby open time4.9 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)09,790
Tracked versions2104
Last hostedJun 19, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
5
30,642
Jul 26
0
13,846

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Corona and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,450 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 5 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Corona (2).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 4.9 min for Corona. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,790 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Corona has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.