WC3 TrackerMaps[Ct]V0.9e vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

[Ct]V0.9e vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,492 recorded sessions versus 2. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2), suggesting larger games. [Ct]V0.9e lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

[Ct]V0.9e Warofraces
Head to Head
Metric[Ct]V0.9eWarofraces
Total sessions27,492
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby24.6
Avg lobby open time1.5 min 3.9 min
Sessions (30d)21,621
Tracked versions136
Last hostedJul 4, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
2
1,215

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing [Ct]V0.9e and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,492 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than [Ct]V0.9e (2).
[Ct]V0.9e lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,621 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
[Ct]V0.9e has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.