WC3 TrackerMapsDaemonic Sword Orpg R4.20 vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Daemonic Sword Orpg R4.20 vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,430 recorded sessions versus 14. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1.4), suggesting larger games. Daemonic Sword Orpg R4.20 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Daemonic Sword Orpg R4.20 Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricDaemonic Sword Orpg R4.20Direct Strike
Total sessions1447,430
Unique hosts91,615
Avg players/lobby1.45.3
Avg lobby open time1.5 min 1.7 min
Sessions (30d)1410,008
Tracked versions1104
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
0
30,642
Jul 26
14
13,801

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Daemonic Sword Orpg R4.20 and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,430 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 14 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Daemonic Sword Orpg R4.20 (1.4).
Daemonic Sword Orpg R4.20 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,008 vs 14). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Daemonic Sword Orpg R4.20 has been hosted by 9 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.