WC3 TrackerMapsDarkness Reborn vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Darkness Reborn vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 41,753 recorded sessions versus 26. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.8), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2 min for Darkness Reborn. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Darkness Reborn Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricDarkness RebornDirect Strike
Total sessions2641,753
Unique hosts21,615
Avg players/lobby1.85.2
Avg lobby open time2 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)310,918
Tracked versions5102
Last hostedJul 4, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
24
30,642
Jul 26
3
7,316

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Darkness Reborn and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 41,753 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 26 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Darkness Reborn (1.8).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2 min for Darkness Reborn. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,918 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Darkness Reborn has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.