WC3 TrackerMapsDfg vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Dfg vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 41,634 recorded sessions versus 29. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 2.1), suggesting larger games. Dfg lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Dfg Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricDfgDirect Strike
Total sessions2941,634
Unique hosts21,615
Avg players/lobby2.15.2
Avg lobby open time0.2 min 1.7 min
Sessions (30d)2910,835
Tracked versions1102
Last hostedJul 1, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
23
30,642
Jul 26
6
7,181

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Dfg and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 41,634 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 29 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Dfg (2.1).
Dfg lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,835 vs 29). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Dfg has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.