WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Ekfr
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Ekfr

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 18,523 recorded sessions versus 76. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.5), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 4.5 min for Ekfr. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Ekfr
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeEkfr
Total sessions18,523 76
Unique hosts1,615 10
Avg players/lobby5.2 1.5
Avg lobby open time1.6 min 4.5 min
Sessions (30d)9,808 33
Tracked versions711
Last hostedJun 10, 2026Jun 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
8,392
37
Jun 26
10,523
38

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Ekfr on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 18,523 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 76 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Ekfr (1.5).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 4.5 min for Ekfr. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,808 vs 33). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Ekfr by 10. Direct Strike has the wider host base.