WC3 Tracker›Maps›Direct Strike vs Enfos Team Survival Ultimate
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Enfos Team Survival Ultimate

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 18,874 recorded sessions versus 3. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.7), suggesting larger games. Enfos Team Survival Ultimate lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.5 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Enfos Team Survival Ultimate
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeEnfos Team Survival Ultimate
Total sessions18,874 ▲3
Unique hosts1,615 ▲2
Avg players/lobby5.2 ▲1.7
Avg lobby open time1.6 min0.5 min ▲
Sessions (30d)9,352 ▲3
Tracked versions751
Last hostedJun 13, 2026Jun 13, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
8,392
1
Jun 26
10,899
3
Explore Each Map
Direct Strike full stats → Enfos Team Survival Ultimate full stats → Watch live Direct Strike lobbies Watch live Enfos Team Survival Ultimate lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Enfos Team Survival Ultimate on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 18,874 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Enfos Team Survival Ultimate (1.7).
Enfos Team Survival Ultimate lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.5 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,352 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Enfos Team Survival Ultimate by 2. Direct Strike has the wider host base.