WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Fall Of Rome
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Fall Of Rome

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 55,729 recorded sessions versus 23. Fall Of Rome averages more players per lobby (7.6 vs 5.2), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 22.9 min for Fall Of Rome. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Fall Of Rome
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeFall Of Rome
Total sessions55,729 23
Unique hosts1,615 6
Avg players/lobby5.27.6
Avg lobby open time1.7 min 22.9 min
Sessions (30d)6,595 19
Tracked versions1123
Last hostedJul 25, 2026Jul 25, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
30,642
1
Jul 26
444,190
22

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Fall Of Rome on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 55,729 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 23 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Fall Of Rome has more players per lobby on average (7.6) than Direct Strike (5.2).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 22.9 min for Fall Of Rome. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (6,595 vs 19). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Fall Of Rome by 6. Direct Strike has the wider host base.