WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Hearttoheart
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Hearttoheart

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 41,856 recorded sessions versus 128. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.6), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2 min for Hearttoheart. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Hearttoheart
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeHearttoheart
Total sessions41,856 128
Unique hosts1,615 63
Avg players/lobby5.2 1.6
Avg lobby open time1.7 min 2 min
Sessions (30d)10,411 79
Tracked versions1022
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
73
Jun 26
30,642
172
Jul 26
7,424
65

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Hearttoheart on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 41,856 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 128 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Hearttoheart (1.6).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2 min for Hearttoheart. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,411 vs 79). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Hearttoheart by 63. Direct Strike has the wider host base.