WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Icecrown
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Icecrown

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 41,634 recorded sessions versus 678. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.7), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.4 min for Icecrown. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Icecrown
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeIcecrown
Total sessions41,634 678
Unique hosts1,615 263
Avg players/lobby5.2 1.7
Avg lobby open time1.7 min 2.4 min
Sessions (30d)10,799 393
Tracked versions10221
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
337
Jun 26
30,642
1,046
Jul 26
7,181
270

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Icecrown on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 41,634 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 678 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Icecrown (1.7).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.4 min for Icecrown. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,799 vs 393). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Icecrown by 263. Direct Strike has the wider host base.