WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Iceforge
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Iceforge

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 18,501 recorded sessions versus 11. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.8), suggesting larger games. Iceforge lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Iceforge
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeIceforge
Total sessions18,501 11
Unique hosts1,615 10
Avg players/lobby5.2 1.8
Avg lobby open time1.6 min0.8 min
Sessions (30d)9,752 11
Tracked versions701
Last hostedJun 9, 2026Jun 8, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
8,392
6
Jun 26
10,499
11

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Iceforge on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 18,501 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 11 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Iceforge (1.8).
Iceforge lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,752 vs 11). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Iceforge by 10. Direct Strike has the wider host base.