WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Lastrefuge
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Lastrefuge

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 55,730 recorded sessions versus 215. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.9), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.1 min for Lastrefuge. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Lastrefuge
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeLastrefuge
Total sessions55,730 215
Unique hosts1,615 63
Avg players/lobby5.2 1.9
Avg lobby open time1.7 min 2.1 min
Sessions (30d)6,811 49
Tracked versions1126
Last hostedJul 25, 2026Jul 25, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
89
Jun 26
30,642
217
Jul 26
444,372
386

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Lastrefuge on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 55,730 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 215 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Lastrefuge (1.9).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.1 min for Lastrefuge. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (6,811 vs 49). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Lastrefuge by 63. Direct Strike has the wider host base.