WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Lich Td Lua Wip
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Lich Td Lua Wip

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 42,620 recorded sessions versus 11. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.8), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 5.5 min for Lich Td Lua Wip. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Lich Td Lua Wip
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeLich Td Lua Wip
Total sessions42,620 11
Unique hosts1,615 3
Avg players/lobby5.2 1.8
Avg lobby open time1.7 min 5.5 min
Sessions (30d)10,836 11
Tracked versions1021
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 4, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
30,642
0
Jul 26
8,287
11

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Lich Td Lua Wip on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 42,620 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 11 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Lich Td Lua Wip (1.8).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 5.5 min for Lich Td Lua Wip. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,836 vs 11). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Lich Td Lua Wip by 3. Direct Strike has the wider host base.