WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Mafa T H Defence
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Mafa T H Defence

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 42,696 recorded sessions versus 9. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Mafa T H Defence lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.4 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Mafa T H Defence
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeMafa T H Defence
Total sessions42,696 9
Unique hosts1,615 2
Avg players/lobby5.2 2
Avg lobby open time1.7 min0.4 min
Sessions (30d)10,925 0
Tracked versions1021
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jun 21, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
1
Jun 26
30,642
9
Jul 26
8,366
0

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Mafa T H Defence on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 42,696 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 9 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Mafa T H Defence (2).
Mafa T H Defence lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.4 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,925 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Mafa T H Defence by 2. Direct Strike has the wider host base.