WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Mafa Td Second Defence
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Mafa Td Second Defence

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 55,230 recorded sessions versus 33. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 4.1), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.4 min for Mafa Td Second Defence. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Mafa Td Second Defence
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeMafa Td Second Defence
Total sessions55,230 33
Unique hosts1,615 6
Avg players/lobby5.2 4.1
Avg lobby open time1.7 min 3.4 min
Sessions (30d)7,007 33
Tracked versions1122
Last hostedJul 24, 2026Jul 24, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
1
Jun 26
30,642
7
Jul 26
443,218
41

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Mafa Td Second Defence on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 55,230 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 33 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Mafa Td Second Defence (4.1).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.4 min for Mafa Td Second Defence. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (7,007 vs 33). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Mafa Td Second Defence by 6. Direct Strike has the wider host base.