WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs M.H.D
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs M.H.D

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 42,620 recorded sessions versus 20. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.9), suggesting larger games. M.H.D lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike M.H.D
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeM.H.D
Total sessions42,620 20
Unique hosts1,615 2
Avg players/lobby5.2 1.9
Avg lobby open time1.7 min1.5 min
Sessions (30d)10,836 3
Tracked versions1022
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jun 29, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
8
Jun 26
30,642
13
Jul 26
8,287
0

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and M.H.D on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 42,620 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 20 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than M.H.D (1.9).
M.H.D lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,836 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and M.H.D by 2. Direct Strike has the wider host base.