WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Ogremound
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Ogremound

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 43,044 recorded sessions versus 226. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.3), suggesting larger games. Ogremound lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.3 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Ogremound
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeOgremound
Total sessions43,044 226
Unique hosts1,615 113
Avg players/lobby5.2 1.3
Avg lobby open time1.7 min1.3 min
Sessions (30d)10,241 100
Tracked versions1021
Last hostedJul 7, 2026Jul 7, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
113
Jun 26
30,642
279
Jul 26
8,751
88

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Ogremound on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 43,044 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 226 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Ogremound (1.3).
Ogremound lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.3 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,241 vs 100). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Ogremound by 113. Direct Strike has the wider host base.