WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P)
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P)

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 27,564 recorded sessions versus 4. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 2.8), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 1.9 min for Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P). Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P)
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikePokemonteamtd 2.0(P)
Total sessions27,564 4
Unique hosts1,615 3
Avg players/lobby5.2 2.8
Avg lobby open time1.6 min 1.9 min
Sessions (30d)9,575 4
Tracked versions872
Last hostedJun 24, 2026Jun 20, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
8,392
2
Jun 26
20,184
4

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P) on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 27,564 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P) (2.8).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 1.9 min for Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P). A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,575 vs 4). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Pokemonteamtd 2.0(P) by 3. Direct Strike has the wider host base.