WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Revampbloodelf
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Revampbloodelf

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 41,753 recorded sessions versus 14. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Revampbloodelf lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Revampbloodelf
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeRevampbloodelf
Total sessions41,753 14
Unique hosts1,615 5
Avg players/lobby5.2 1
Avg lobby open time1.7 min0.2 min
Sessions (30d)10,918 13
Tracked versions1025
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
30,642
3
Jul 26
7,316
12

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Revampbloodelf on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 41,753 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 14 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Revampbloodelf (1).
Revampbloodelf lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,918 vs 13). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Revampbloodelf by 5. Direct Strike has the wider host base.