WC3 Tracker›Maps›Direct Strike vs Rough Survival In The Forest
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Rough Survival In The Forest

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 41,694 recorded sessions versus 11. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 2.6), suggesting larger games. Rough Survival In The Forest lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Rough Survival In The Forest
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeRough Survival In The Forest
Total sessions41,694 ▲11
Unique hosts1,615 ▲3
Avg players/lobby5.2 ▲2.6
Avg lobby open time1.7 min0.8 min ▲
Sessions (30d)10,866 ▲11
Tracked versions1021
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
30,642
0
Jul 26
7,248
11
Explore Each Map
Direct Strike full stats → Rough Survival In The Forest full stats → Watch live Direct Strike lobbies Watch live Rough Survival In The Forest lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Rough Survival In The Forest on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 41,694 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 11 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Rough Survival In The Forest (2.6).
Rough Survival In The Forest lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,866 vs 11). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Rough Survival In The Forest by 3. Direct Strike has the wider host base.