WC3 Tracker›Maps›Direct Strike vs Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,450 recorded sessions versus 7. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1.9), suggesting larger games. Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeStar Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest
Total sessions47,450 ▲7
Unique hosts1,615 ▲3
Avg players/lobby5.3 ▲1.9
Avg lobby open time1.7 min0.8 min ▲
Sessions (30d)9,796 ▲3
Tracked versions1044
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
30,642
5
Jul 26
14,112
3
Explore Each Map
Direct Strike full stats → Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest full stats → Watch live Direct Strike lobbies Watch live Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,450 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 7 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest (1.9).
Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.8 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,796 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Star Wars Battlefront Kalasmoon Conquest by 3. Direct Strike has the wider host base.