WC3 Tracker›Maps›Direct Strike vs Tidesofblood.V.O.Beta.1.28
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Tidesofblood.V.O.Beta.1.28

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 55,730 recorded sessions versus 4. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Tidesofblood.V.O.Beta.1.28 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.7 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Tidesofblood.V.O.Beta.1.28
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeTidesofblood.V.O.Beta.1.28
Total sessions55,730 ▲4
Unique hosts1,615 ▲2
Avg players/lobby5.2 ▲1
Avg lobby open time1.7 min0.7 min ▲
Sessions (30d)6,864 ▲1
Tracked versions1121
Last hostedJul 25, 2026Jul 22, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
30,642
0
Jul 26
444,438
7
Explore Each Map
Direct Strike full stats → Tidesofblood.V.O.Beta.1.28 full stats → Watch live Direct Strike lobbies Watch live Tidesofblood.V.O.Beta.1.28 lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Tidesofblood.V.O.Beta.1.28 on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 55,730 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Tidesofblood.V.O.Beta.1.28 (1).
Tidesofblood.V.O.Beta.1.28 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.7 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (6,864 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Tidesofblood.V.O.Beta.1.28 by 2. Direct Strike has the wider host base.