WC3 Tracker›Maps›Direct Strike vs Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate)
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate)

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 18,523 recorded sessions versus 636. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 3.7), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 5.9 min for Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate). Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate)
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeUndead Coming(Ionutep Translate)
Total sessions18,523 ▲636
Unique hosts1,615 ▲40
Avg players/lobby5.2 ▲3.7
Avg lobby open time1.6 min ▲5.9 min
Sessions (30d)9,638 ▲489
Tracked versions712
Last hostedJun 10, 2026Jun 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
8,392
392
Jun 26
10,523
563
Explore Each Map
Direct Strike full stats → Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate) full stats → Watch live Direct Strike lobbies Watch live Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate) lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate) on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 18,523 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 636 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate) (3.7).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 5.9 min for Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate). A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,638 vs 489). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Undead Coming(Ionutep Translate) by 40. Direct Strike has the wider host base.