WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Wardraft With Options
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Wardraft With Options

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,534 recorded sessions versus 3. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Wardraft With Options lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Wardraft With Options
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeWardraft With Options
Total sessions47,534 3
Unique hosts1,615 2
Avg players/lobby5.3 1
Avg lobby open time1.7 min1.4 min
Sessions (30d)9,816 3
Tracked versions1041
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
30,642
0
Jul 26
14,470
3

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Wardraft With Options on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,534 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Wardraft With Options (1).
Wardraft With Options lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,816 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Wardraft With Options by 2. Direct Strike has the wider host base.