WC3 Tracker›Maps›Direct Strike vs Wilderness Battlefields (V 1)
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Wilderness Battlefields (V 1)

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 41,984 recorded sessions versus 4. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.8), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.8 min for Wilderness Battlefields (V 1). Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Wilderness Battlefields (V 1)
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeWilderness Battlefields (V 1)
Total sessions41,984 ▲4
Unique hosts1,615 ▲1
Avg players/lobby5.2 ▲1.8
Avg lobby open time1.7 min ▲3.8 min
Sessions (30d)10,572 ▲1
Tracked versions1021
Last hostedJul 6, 2026Jul 4, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
30,642
0
Jul 26
7,578
1
Explore Each Map
Direct Strike full stats → Wilderness Battlefields (V 1) full stats → Watch live Direct Strike lobbies Watch live Wilderness Battlefields (V 1) lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Wilderness Battlefields (V 1) on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 41,984 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Wilderness Battlefields (V 1) (1.8).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.8 min for Wilderness Battlefields (V 1). A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,572 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Wilderness Battlefields (V 1) by 1. Direct Strike has the wider host base.