WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Wrath
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Wrath

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 43,146 recorded sessions versus 4. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 1.3), suggesting larger games. Wrath lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Wrath
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeWrath
Total sessions43,146 4
Unique hosts1,615 1
Avg players/lobby5.2 1.3
Avg lobby open time1.7 min1 min
Sessions (30d)10,367 1
Tracked versions1022
Last hostedJul 7, 2026Jul 4, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
30,642
1
Jul 26
8,883
1

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Wrath on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 43,146 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Wrath (1.3).
Wrath lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,367 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Wrath by 1. Direct Strike has the wider host base.