WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Zerglingdefence
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Zerglingdefence

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 31,859 recorded sessions versus 2. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 0.5), suggesting larger games. Zerglingdefence lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Zerglingdefence
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeZerglingdefence
Total sessions31,859 2
Unique hosts1,615 1
Avg players/lobby5.2 0.5
Avg lobby open time1.6 min0.2 min
Sessions (30d)10,301 2
Tracked versions931
Last hostedJun 28, 2026Jun 23, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
8,392
0
Jun 26
26,414
2

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Zerglingdefence on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 31,859 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Zerglingdefence (0.5).
Zerglingdefence lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.2 min on average versus 1.6 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,301 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Zerglingdefence by 1. Direct Strike has the wider host base.