WC3 TrackerMapsDirect Strike vs Zoodefencerb
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Direct Strike vs Zoodefencerb

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 41,753 recorded sessions versus 66. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 2.9), suggesting larger games. Zoodefencerb lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Direct Strike Zoodefencerb
Head to Head
MetricDirect StrikeZoodefencerb
Total sessions41,753 66
Unique hosts1,615 9
Avg players/lobby5.2 2.9
Avg lobby open time1.7 min1.4 min
Sessions (30d)10,942 13
Tracked versions1022
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
8,392
2
Jun 26
30,642
75
Jul 26
7,316
12

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Direct Strike and Zoodefencerb on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 41,753 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 66 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Zoodefencerb (2.9).
Zoodefencerb lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.4 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,942 vs 13). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Direct Strike has been hosted by 1,615 unique BattleTags and Zoodefencerb by 9. Direct Strike has the wider host base.