WC3 TrackerMapsDivideandconquers vs Zombie Defense
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Divideandconquers vs Zombie Defense

Zombie Defense is the more popular of the two, with 4,912 recorded sessions versus 18. Zombie Defense averages more players per lobby (2.7 vs 1), suggesting larger games. Divideandconquers lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2 min on average versus 2.4 min for Zombie Defense. Over the past 30 days, Zombie Defense has seen more activity.

Divideandconquers Zombie Defense
Head to Head
MetricDivideandconquersZombie Defense
Total sessions184,912
Unique hosts2281
Avg players/lobby12.7
Avg lobby open time2 min 2.4 min
Sessions (30d)122,350
Tracked versions130
Last hostedJun 19, 2026Jun 19, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
9
2,307
Jun 26
14
2,612

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Divideandconquers and Zombie Defense on Warcraft 3

Zombie Defense is more popular, with 4,912 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 18 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Zombie Defense has more players per lobby on average (2.7) than Divideandconquers (1).
Divideandconquers lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2 min on average versus 2.4 min for Zombie Defense. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Zombie Defense has had more sessions in the last 30 days (2,350 vs 12). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Divideandconquers has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Zombie Defense by 281. Zombie Defense has the wider host base.