WC3 TrackerMapsFateanotherwest S vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Fateanotherwest S vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,487 recorded sessions versus 551. Fateanotherwest S averages more players per lobby (5.4 vs 4.6), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 9 min for Fateanotherwest S. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Fateanotherwest S Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricFateanotherwest SWarofraces
Total sessions5517,487
Unique hosts18258
Avg players/lobby5.4 4.6
Avg lobby open time9 min3.9 min
Sessions (30d)101,683
Tracked versions1735
Last hostedJul 3, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
123
1,531
Jun 26
241
4,233
Jul 26
3
1,180

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Fateanotherwest S and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,487 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 551 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Fateanotherwest S has more players per lobby on average (5.4) than Warofraces (4.6).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 9 min for Fateanotherwest S. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,683 vs 10). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Fateanotherwest S has been hosted by 18 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.