WC3 TrackerMapsFgord Beta vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Fgord Beta vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,480 recorded sessions versus 1,320. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.4), suggesting larger games. Fgord Beta lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.2 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Fgord Beta Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricFgord BetaWarofraces
Total sessions1,3207,480
Unique hosts72258
Avg players/lobby1.44.6
Avg lobby open time1.2 min 3.9 min
Sessions (30d)11,662
Tracked versions1335
Last hostedJun 30, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
453
1,531
Jun 26
278
4,233
Jul 26
0
1,158

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Fgord Beta and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,480 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 1,320 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Fgord Beta (1.4).
Fgord Beta lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.2 min on average versus 3.9 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,662 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Fgord Beta has been hosted by 72 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.