WC3 TrackerMapsFictional Showdown X vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Fictional Showdown X vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,487 recorded sessions versus 4. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.8), suggesting larger games. Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 6.2 min for Fictional Showdown X. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Fictional Showdown X Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricFictional Showdown XWarofraces
Total sessions47,487
Unique hosts2258
Avg players/lobby1.84.6
Avg lobby open time6.2 min3.9 min
Sessions (30d)31,682
Tracked versions235
Last hostedJul 4, 2026Jul 5, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
1
1,531
Jun 26
3
4,233
Jul 26
1
1,180

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Fictional Showdown X and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,487 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 4 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Fictional Showdown X (1.8).
Warofraces lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.9 min on average versus 6.2 min for Fictional Showdown X. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,682 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Fictional Showdown X has been hosted by 2 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.